Today, the Co-Chairs of the ADP—the ad-hoc all-nation working group that is responsible for writing the Paris climate agreement—released their new draft of a potential streamlining approach for the standing legal text, agreed in Geneva, in February. The Co-Chairs note, in a preface, to this new draft, that “inclusion of certain (sets of) articles or paragraphs is without prejudice to the views of the Parties, and that nothing is agreed until everything is agreed.”

The new “Co-Chairs’ Tool” is a device intended to provide guidance to negotiators. The document is actually several texts compiled into one guidance tool:

  1. [Page I of V] A Scenario Note (for the ADP 2.10—negotiations that open on August 31 in Bonn, Germany)
  2. [Page V of V] A Draft Schedule for the work of the ADP 2.10
  3. [Page 1] An Explanatory Note for the rest of the Co-Chairs’ Tool
  4. [Page 6] A Table of Contents for Parts 1, 2 and 3 of the Co-Chairs’ Tool
  5. [Page 8] Part 1: A Draft Agreement (to be agreed in Paris in December)
  6. [Page 27] Part 2: A Draft Decision (Agreement requires consensus Decision)
  7. [Page 48] Part 3: Unplaced Provisions (need clarity on Agreement or Decision)

Together, those 7 texts make up the July 24 Co-Chairs’ text (a.k.a. the Co-Chairs’ Tool or the July 24 Draft). The July 24 Draft is laid out as a Scenario Note for the ADP 2.10 Negotiations, which open on August 31, in Bonn, Germany, with two Annexes: The “Draft schedule of work” (for the ADP 2.10) and the “Co-Chairs’ Tool: A Non-Paper Illustrating Possible Elements of the Paris Package”.

The climate negotiations are a global brainstorming process, focused on implementation of the 1992 Rio Climate Treaty, also known as the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). That “nothing is agreed until everything is agreed” is a nod to the sovereignty of nation states, and to the requirement for a consensus decision at the 21st Conference of the Parties to the UNFCCC (COP21) in Paris, which opens on November 30.

The current negotiating process is substantially different, improved, and more conducive to ambitious outcomes, than in previous years. A few key points to consider:

  • Previous negotiations—Cancun, Durban, Doha and Warsaw—set in motion a process whereby each nation can adopt a nationally determined strategy for fully mobilizing its own capabilities to reduce harmful emissions and speed the transition to a clean energy economy.
  • This means we have a framework designed to motivate a “race to the top”, where economically, diplomatically and otherwise, nations are rewarded for early and ambitious action, and there is a clear global direction of travel: low carbon prosperity.
  • The Lima Call for Climate Action included the more ambitious 1.5ºC target for maximum global average temperature rise—a potential motivator for earlier, more aggressive investment in low-carbon development.
  • The Geneva negotiating text—currently the active legal document—allowed each nation to add constructive ideas and contains “something for everyone”.
  • Among the most motivational and transformational provisions included are: full decarbonization by 2050, negative emissions by 2100, the 1.5ºC temperature-rise limit, and a requirement that there be “no backsliding” on any area of climate action.
  • A new collaborative framework is being developed—outside the UNFCCC process, but in support of its success—to bring governments, intergovernmental organizations, business leaders and civil society groups together in a multi-stakeholder process to build capacity for and implement best-practice carbon pricing strategies.
  • In June, the G7 nations committed to support decarbonization of the global economy by the year 2100.
  • Also in June, the Major Groups requested that the Co-Chairs of the ADP, the all-nation working group writing the Paris agreement, produce their own suggested streamlined text, as a reference for refining the Geneva text and negotiating toward Paris. (Today’s release.)
  • The streamlining approach the ADP Co-Chairs have taken aims to shorten the text and eliminate redundancies while ensuring no active provisions or principles are taken out. That will be for the negotiators to work out, when talks re-open at the end of August.

There is emerging consensus that all nations should be moving as quickly as possible to economy-wide low-carbon development, with cost-effective economic instruments and catalytic subsidy reform. We are already seeing escalating ambition from leading economies and from developing countries, and there is serious momentum toward activating a process in Paris that will ensure we continue to see escalating ambition year after year, and a process designed to ensure resilient prosperity while all economies phase out the emission of greenhouse gases.

The new document is being described by the Co-Chairs not as a draft agreement or a new negotiating text—though it is, in a sense, a suggested course for both—but rather as a “tool”, a reference that can be used to facilitate a more constructive and cohesive negotiating process. This tool is intellectual and procedural guidance for the national governments who will decide what the final agreement looks like.

Click here to join the team...
The Pathway to Paris project empowers you to play a role.

The Co-Chairs have said the Paris agreement will actually be a “Paris Climate Package”:

  • a formal consensus agreement to move forward according to agree principles, that document an expression of the mandate in the 1992 Rio Climate Treaty (the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change), which mandates action to avoid dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system
  • a formal consensus decision of the Conference of the Parties to adopt the agreement
  • an annex including nationally determined contributions (to the global effort) from all 196 parties to the UNFCCC, which will effectively be the action agenda, with each NDC rooted in each nation’s system of laws, and so legally binding

The Paris Climate Package might also include a new “work plan” for implementation of the Agreement and the NDCs, and for ratcheting up or escalating ambition, over time. This has not been formally set in motion, but is one option that exists for streamlining the agreement text, while also setting a clear program for action.

Major sticking points that will need solving continue to be: financing for global distributed generation, cost-effective or no-cost technology transfer, proactive differentiated responsibility (the biggest polluters doing the most, while all nations do the maximum possible within their respective capabilities), and whether prescriptions for carbon pricing instruments will be included, suggested, or required, by the Paris Climate Package.

Civil society groups and developing nations, especially island states, will be calling for the most ambitious outcome: 100% renewables by 2050, negative emissions soon after, and coordinated action to stay below the 1.5ºC temperature-rise limit.

Two staples for assessing and ensuring future success will be:

  • A robust and authoritative role for citizen, stakeholder and civil society engagement
  • A new standard for ongoing review with regular upgrading of national climate action

The Streamlined Text Draft and Scenario Note presented today by the ADP Co-Chairs make important improvements to the language of the emerging Paris agreement. It creates a solid foundation for a new, more action-oriented negotiating process, where governments will be deciding not only what global targets to aim for, but how best to mobilize national climate action that attracts investment, builds sustainable long-term development, and situates climate leaders as major contributors to shaping the future landscape of global politics.

There is no one key agenda item where failure will pull the whole agreement apart, and that is a strength in the 2015 process.

First published July 24, 2015, at PathwaytoParis.org

Written by Joseph Robertson

Joseph is Global Strategy Director for the non-partisan non-profit Citizens' Climate Lobby. He coordinates the building of CCL's citizen engagement groups on 5 continents, leads the Citizens' Climate Engagement Network and represents CCL in the Carbon Pricing Leadership Coalition, UNFCCC negotiations, and other UN processes. He is a member of the Executive Board of the UN-linked NGO Committee on Sustainable Development-NY and of the Policy and Strategy Group for the World We Want. He is also the founder of Geoversiv.net and the Geoversiv Foundation and the lead strategist supporting the high-level climate dialogue series Accelerating Progress, Advancing Innovation.

1 comment

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s